Collectivism and Individualism in The Fountainhead free essay sample

Ayn Rand’s dubious novel The Fountainhead specifically addresses the ideas of community and independence. The characters in the novel are emotional portrayals of Rand’s theory identified with these two convictions; be that as it may, except if the peruser completely appreciates the contrasts between these two philosophical ideas, the activities of the characters lose their hugeness. While the two ideas are philosophical conviction frameworks for controlling conduct, the peruser will characterize the terms by looking at their disparities. The peruser may comprehend the terms at first by looking at the distinctions in the strict and interpretive meanings of each term. The strict definitions uncover noteworthy contrasts in significance. Merriam Websters word reference expresses that independence is, â€Å"a hypothesis keeping up the political and monetary autonomy of the individual and focusing on singular activity, activity, and interests.†(Merriam Webster). As indicated by this equivalent word reference, cooperation is characterized as being â€Å"a political or financial hypothesis upholding aggregate control particularly over creation and dissemination. We will compose a custom article test on Community and Individualism in The Fountainhead or on the other hand any comparative theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page †(Merriam Webster). These definitions just show the political part of the book, anyway the novel is additionally founded on one’s brain and soul. The interpretive definitions feature convincing contrasts between these two convictions. All through the novel the independent is one who saw nothing amiss with his convictions and didn't feel that anybody was substandard compared to him. In spite of the response of others in the start of this novel reasoning that he thought about nobody yet himself, by the end individuals had the option to see that he was â€Å"[. . .] a man absolutely honest of fear† (678). Then again cooperation is characterized as individuals being affected by the entire to turn into a â€Å"socially accepted† individual. Just changing and complying with fit in and feel as though they fit in. The peruser may cement his comprehension of the two conviction frameworks by looking at the contrasting impacts each produces. The impacts of cooperation on the individual and society obviously characterize the way of thinking. Community portrayed in the novel is appeared by expressing that the mass cooperates for a more noteworthy reason and to get equivalent. This community causes â€Å" A reality where no man [. . . ] hold[s] a longing for himself, however [. . .] satisf[ies] the craving of his neighbor†(639). The impacts of independence explain the significance of this conviction framework. Ayn Rand delineates independence just like an individual who accomplishes their objectives, notwithstanding the disadvantages that are constrained upon them and â€Å"[. . .] its greatness started with one [person] and that one paid for his courage†(679). The Foutainhead presents the idea that the maverick consistently needed to battle from the beginning of time and albeit some p aid with their life,†[. . .] they won†(679). What's more, in spite of the fact that crafted by these extraordinary individuals are exceptional, collectivist accept that nobody ought to be made capable and nobody individual ought to be compensated for these culminations. What they derive is that each thought is the generation of somebody elses presuming that nobody thought is one of enormity. The distinctions in the significance of these two terms are apparent all through the novel, both make an equivalent parity to illuminate the peruser regarding what the fundamental issues are. Before I read this book I accepted that independence was the demonstration of self-centeredness and that community was the specialty of individuals combining to turn out to be better. Anyway through cautious perusing and in class conversations I feel that independence is close to an individual following what they think to be correct and help make a final result for the individuals, which is extremely unselfish. What's more, I additionally accept that community is a kind of program arrangement that gives no credit to the individuals who genuinely merit it. Both community and independence have there ruins. Today as I would see it nobody is a genuine independent, yet in addition I see no collectivist to degree that is portrayed in the novel. My feelings on these two speculations have changed altoge ther all through the novel and my last view is that, not every person is great and not every person can be the individual who they genuinely need to be.